<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CodeReview on Time Friend</title><link>https://time-friend.com/en/tags/codereview/</link><description>Recent content in CodeReview on Time Friend</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:15:07 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://time-friend.com/en/tags/codereview/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reviewing Agent Code Is Different from Reviewing Human Code</title><link>https://time-friend.com/en/archive/claude-code-review-agent-code/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://time-friend.com/en/archive/claude-code-review-agent-code/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reviewing code written by a colleague is different from reviewing code written by an agent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Work with someone long enough and you pick up their habits — one person loves reduce, another always misses edge cases. An agent has no habits. Every output depends on the session context.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are the checkpoints I&amp;rsquo;ve built for reviewing agent code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="first-did-it-touch-things-it-shouldnt-have"&gt;First: did it touch things it shouldn&amp;rsquo;t have?&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The agent&amp;rsquo;s biggest problem isn&amp;rsquo;t writing wrong code — it&amp;rsquo;s not controlling itself. It might fix one bug and casually modify a config file next to it, or rename a function that had nothing to do with the task.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>